Method And Apparatus For Ultra-Short Pulsed Laser Communication Through A Lossy Medium

ABSTRACT

Free-space optical (FSO) wireless transmission, including optical communications, remote-sensing, power beaming, etc., can be enhanced by replacing conventional laser sources that operate in the infrared portion of the optical spectrum with ultra-short pulsed laser (USPL) sources having peak pulse powers of one kWatt or greater and pulse lengths of less than one picosecond. Specifically, it has been observed that under these conditions the attenuation of an USPL beam having the same average optical power as a conventional laser in a lossy medium, such as the atmosphere, is substantially less than the attenuation of a conventional laser beam having a lower peak pulse power and/or a longer pulse width. The superior system performance when using an USPL can be translated into an increased distance between a laser source in a transmitter and a photodetector in receiver and/or a higher reliability of system operation in inclement weather conditions.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION(S)

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/269,106, filed Feb. 6, 2019, entitled “Method And Apparatus For Ultra-Short Pulsed Laser Communication Through A Lossy Medium.” This application also claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/627,563, filed Feb. 7, 2018, entitled “METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ULTRA-SHORT PULSED LASER COMMUNICATION THROUGH A LOSSY MEDIUM.” All of the foregoing, including the entirety of their contents, are incorporated herein by reference.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The subject matter described herein relates to free-space optical (FSO) wireless transmission including optical communications, remote-sensing, power beaming, etc., and more particularly, to enhanced optical transport efficiencies that can be realized for wavelength propagation using ultra-short-pulse-laser (USPL) sources for beam propagation through optically impaired atmospheric conditions due to factors that can include without limitation fog, clouds (i.e. water aerosols), atmospheric beam wander, scintillation effects, and the like.

BACKGROUND

Explosive growth in demand for telecommunication services, from both the private as well as commercial and government sectors, has placed an unprecedented strain upon currently available telecommunications networks. Without alternative network delivery technologies and topologies, overall effective network speed is likely to be limited while occurrences of bottlenecks within networks will become increasingly frequent.

Bi-directional, free-space optical (FSO) communications networks can, where feasible, provide a useful alternative to microwave links, wire, or cable system applications. Such networks can be transparent to current as well as future network architectures due to sharing of common technological platforms with fiber optic transmission systems, the backbone of many present day telecommunication systems. FSO communication systems can generally share common fiber-optic components, and commercial optical components can often be utilized for both free-space optical and fiber optic applications. The primary difference in free-space optical data link systems is that the medium of propagation is the atmosphere rather than an optical fiber.

Utilizing current state-of-the art fiber-optic components, free-space optical data links can be fully integrated into current short-haul and long-haul high-speed optical networks. Free-space data links can fully attain current synchronous optical networking (SONET) system architectures, such as for example SONET OC-48 architectures utilizing current 1550 nm wavelength optical technology platforms. Additionally, such systems can be scaled to higher data rates and configurations. Optical data link systems can benefit from operating in an unregulated segment of the electro-magnetic spectrum. Unlike the microwave and RF spectrum, optical data links can generally require no special leasing fees or tariffs to be issued. Additionally, because of the operating wavelength of the system, issues related to eye safety can generally be minimized. Furthermore, no special precautions or permits are typically required operating a free-space optical data link related to territorial right-of-ways. Expenses related to plowing and trenching of fixed cabled systems can also be avoided.

More recently, FSO communication technology has leveraged commercial advancements made within the 1550 nm optical wavelength transmission band. Erbium fiber doped amplifier (EFDA) technology has been incorporated within system design configuration for enhancing the overall effective optical budget for acceptable optical attenuation and thereby extending the reach of transport systems through the atmosphere.

High power optical amplifiers are useful for terrestrial free-space transmission as well as fiber optic systems. Repeater distances have been extended in terrestrial and submarine fiber systems and dense wavelength division multiplexing (DWDM) transmission architectures have been introduced. With the advent of high power Er/Yb optical amplifiers, similar advances as seen in fiber optic transmission have also been realized in optical wireless and free-space laser communications systems. Experimental transmission results for a single-channel 1550 nm free-space optical data-link operating at 2.5 Gbps over a 2.4 km transmission span have been reported, as have results for a four-channel 1550 nm wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) free-space optical data link operating at 10 Gbps over a 4.4 km transmission distance.

While a number of commercial and military FSO communication systems have been developed and are currently in operation, their performance for terrestrial applications is limited by optical attenuation effects associated with the atmosphere cause by inclement weather effects including fog, rain, snow, smoke, and air turbulence. These effects limit the application of FSO communications to relatively short optical transmission distances (on the order of several hundreds of meters) in typical situations where high reliability and uninterrupted availability are required.

On Aug. 4, 1997, a patent application, assigned to Motorola Corporation (application Ser. No. 08/905,760) was filed that promised relief from the undesirable attenuation effects caused by the atmosphere and a patent (U.S. Pat. No. 6,043,920) was granted on this application in 2003. In Column 2 lines 22 to 35 it is stated: “The method and apparatus of the present invention applies the newly-discovered characteristics of these narrow pulse-width signals to the laser communications field. In accordance with a preferred embodiment, an extremely narrow-width, modulated laser pulse can be transmitted through a lossy medium without suffering significant attenuation. Thus, the method and apparatus of the present invention enables extremely high-rate communications through mediums which were previously considered too lossy to be conducive to high-rate laser communications. For example, the method and apparatus of the present invention could be used for laser communications through air, water, water vapor, solid obstructions, particulate suspension, glass fiber, and other mediums.”

However, this assertion was only supported by the statement (Col. 2 lines 16 to 21): “Modern laser technology has enabled the generation of narrow-width pulses and experiments are showing that these narrow-width pulses have characteristics which enable then to penetrate mediums with substantially less attenuation than was suffered by prior-art techniques.”

Claim 1 in this issued patent was very broad being applicable to communication over any wireless link through any lossy medium (such as the atmosphere) with modulated pulses of laser light of unspecified wavelength that has a pulse widths of less than 200 femtoseconds.

Based on research undertaken at Attochron, LLC and elsewhere, it is presumed that this patent, and specifically this claim, was based on a constructive reduction to practice that has never been validated or reproduced by others even after the term of this patent expired in 2017. However, over the years there has been considerable controversy over the subject of possible reduced optical attenuation in various media using ultra short optical pulses. For example, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,583,911 B1 filed on Oct. 6, 2000 and issued Jun. 24, 2003, the inventor, D. R. Alexander, reported on extensive laboratory testing using ultra-short laser pulses less than 100 femtoseconds in duration and having a wavelength in the range of 0.75 to 0.85 microns) that stated: “ . . . the data gave no indication that the pulsed wave transmission was more beneficial than continuous wave.”

This factual data directly contradicted the assertions made in the Motorola patent.

Subsequently, in 2005 and 2006, Ulf Osterberg et al. published two papers [U. J. Gibson, U. L. Osterberg, “Optical Precursors and Beer's Law Violations; Non-Exponential Propagation Losses in Water,” Optics Express 13 6 (2005), and A. E. Fox, U. Osterberg, “Observation of Non-Exponential Absorption of Ultra-fast Pulses in Water,” Optics Express 14 8 (2006)] suggesting that the absorption of an USPL beam may not obey Beer's Law (the exponential attenuation of an optical beam in a lossy medium). These results were used by the authors to suggest that optical absorption losses for femtosecond laser pulses are substantially lower than for a CW laser operating at the same wavelength. Wavelengths in the range of 650 to 800 nm were reported to have been used in the experimental portion of the research work. So, at first, it appeared as though the underlying presumption of anomalously low optical attenuation reported in the Motorola U.S. Pat. No. 6,043,920, filed in 1997, had, perhaps, been post-validated by the work of Ulf Osterberg et al. even if it was somewhat speculative and contradicted by data presented by Alexander in U.S. Pat. No. 6,583,911 B1.

However, an important paper published in 2007 by Jian Chao Li et al from the University of Nebraska [University of Nebraska—Lincoln; DigitalCommon@University of Nebraska—Lincoln; Faculty Publications from the Department of Electrical Engineering, 2-2007] titled “Propagation of ultrashort laser pulses through water” specifically refutes the above conclusions and explanations given by Osterberg et al. This paper concludes that the sub-Beer's Law (non-exponential) absorption effect observed by Osterberg et al. is merely due to the broad spectral band of the USPL and unrelated to the shortness of the laser pulses. Li et al. pointed out that the same sub-Beers effect would be observed for an incoherent CW light source with the same broad spectral band as the USPL. Thus, sub-Beer's law absorption cannot be directly attributed to lower attenuation of femtosecond pulses in water. This, in turn, throws into question, once again, any advantage of using ultra-short pulses for enhanced transmission through a lossy media as taught by the inventors at Motorola in U.S. Pat. No. 6,043,920.

The clearest answer to the question “Is there any advantage to using an USPL for enhanced transmission through the atmosphere?” appears to come from the work of Paul Corrigan et al. in a 2007 paper titled “Enhanced Performance of Low-Power (60 mW) Femtosecond Free Space Optical Communication System Over Conventional CW Operation” [Proc. SPIE 6457, Free-Space Laser Communication Technologies XIX and Atmospheric Propagation of Electromagnetic Waves, 64570X (12 Feb. 2007)]. And the answer to the above question appears to be a marginal “Yes” for optical scattering and a “No, not yet” for optical absorption. The authors of this paper state in their conclusion:

“Once the transmission and scattering properties of a stable substance are known (usually determined in two different measurements), the difference is the absorption. This [separating absorption effects from scattering effects] is particularly hard to do in simulated fog, as the simulation itself is unstable, as is real fog. However, there is no current measurement or claim which indicates this enhanced propagation is related to different physics of absorption of Ultrafast Pulses by the atmosphere.”

It should be pointed out here that this work by Corrigan et al. was conducted at a longer wavelength (1560 nm) than that used by the previously reported researchers. So, that there may be a different explanation for these results as compared with some or all of the other results discussed above.

Faced with all of the above unsubstantiated results and subsequent contradiction and controversy, it is not surprising the growth of FSO communications has been limited and that there has not yet been a single commercial system produced that is based on the claims in the expired Motorola patent (U.S. Pat. No. 6,043,920). Clearly, it would be beneficial to establish once-and-for all if using ultra-short laser pulses would substantially improve terrestrial free space optical communications under inclement conditions. And if the result were positive, this would represent a major breakthrough and have a substantial favorable impact on the future adoption of FSO communications.

SUMMARY OF THE DISCLOSURE

A turning point relative to this above discussed controversy occurred in 2013 with the publication of an article in the 2013 issue of Laser Focus by Isaac Kim el al. titled “ADVANCES IN COMMUNICATIONS: New FSO provides reliable 10 Gbit/sec and beyond backhaul connections”. This article reported: “Experiments performed by Attochron, LLC at a 500 m wireless testing facility at the U.S. Army's Picatinny Arsenal in Dover, N.J., demonstrated that USP laser-based FSO systems have an up to 25 dB increase in receive power over a legacy CW FSO system in fog.” These authors also mention that “Legacy FSO systems work well in clear or hazy weather at distances up to 1.5 km, but the presence of fog can reduce effective link distances to 200 m [I. I. Kim, Lightwave, 26, 19-21 (2009)]”.

In this work, an USPL system and a CW laser system were simultaneously operated, side-by-side, with their laser beams traveling over adjacent optical paths on the same testing range. They go on to say: “These new USP FSO system's output is produced by a passively mode-locked 100 fs pulse at 1550 nm, with an average output power of 50 mW with a 1 Gbit/s [data] repetition rate. The stream of ultrashort pulses is modulated externally to produce the gigabit Ethernet signal. In Picatinny Arsenal experiments, a single 3 inch diameter telescope was used on the transmit side and a similar 3 inch telescope was used on the receiver side.”

The conclusion reached by Isaac Kim et al. is that: “In preliminary testing of our prototype USP laser-based FSO systems, the 25 dB additional margin improves link availability at 1 Gbit/s to 99.5% at [a range of] 3 km”.

Subsequent to obtaining these important results during the Picatinny Arsenal testing in 2010 and 2011, a patent application (application Ser. No. 13/737,898) was filed by Attochron LLC on Jan. 16, 2013 with broad claims describing: “An optical communication apparatus comprising: an ultra-short-pulse-laser (USPL) source that generates a beam comprising light pulses each having a duration of approximately 1 nanosecond or shorter (claim 1), or 1 picosecond or shorter (claim 3) or 1 femtosecond or shorter (claim 4) . . . ” However, the scope of the granted patent claims was substantially limited by the following clause that was added to all of the claims during the course of prosecution of the application: “Wherein the optical transceiver is configured to detect atmospheric elements enabling analysis of a backscattered signal of an air-borne particulate signature of the detected atmospheric elements to enable adjustment of the beam generated by the USPL source enhancing atmospheric penetration.”

In effect, the broader claims of the original application were not allowed because it was not evident from the filed Attochron patent application that an invention had been made without this restrictive clause. Specifically, the field testing results obtained by Attochron LLC at the Picatinny Arsenal were not even mentioned in the specification. But, even if they had been so introduced it would not have been evident that the superior system performance observed and reported by the workers from Attochron LLC during field testing at the Picatinny Arsenal were simply due to one or more already well know effects such as (1) a reduced effect of atmospheric turbulence on the USPL beam because of its known lower coherence than the CW laser beam that was used as a reference during the Picatinny Arsenal testing, and/or (2) a known improved signal to noise ratio when detecting laser beams with higher peak pulses as compared to CW laser beams or comparable energy per received bit (see L. Biovin et al., “Receiver Sensitivity Improvement by Impulsive Coding”, IEEE PHOTONICS TECHNOLOGY LETTERS, Vol. 9, No. 5, May 1997), or (3) other known factors.

One of the objectives of the present application is to summarize all of the important results that were observed during testing at the Picatinny Arsenal in 2010 and 2011 as well as further results that that have been revealed by extensive analysis of the recorded data that was finally concluded in October, 2017. These results are impressive. During heavy fog conditions as well as during clear warm weather conditions that cause scintillation effects, the USPL system's performance showed, in both cases, a superiority of greater than 25 dB in received signal margin as compared with a side-by-side CW laser FSO system operating over the same testing range and, in fact, over the exact same optical path as the USPL beam's path. Furthermore, the observed at least 25 dB superiority factor of the USPL system over the CW system is only a lower limit to, possibly, a much greater factor that appears likely when more powerful laser sources will be evaluated.

It should be noted that the at least 25 dB superiority factor of the USPL system over the CW system, discussed above, is expressed in logarithmic terms, as is conventional for describing the performance of many types of communication systems. In linear terms, this is equivalent to a factor of 316 or greater (log₁₀ 316=10×2.5=25 dB). When expressed in this way, it is evident that this is a very large factor that was unexpected based on any reported prior art or known physics.

While there are a number of theories that might explain part or all of the observed results, it is likely that some non-linear optical phenomenon that is not yet understood or broadly accepted contributes to the large observed superiority factor associated with the USPL vs the CW laser test result. Preliminary testing at Attochron LLC also suggests that this is the case. Specifically, the observed superiority factor does not show up when using ultra-short laser pulses having lower peak power levels of less than approximately 1 kiloWatt. But, the superiority factor becomes evident when using ultra-short laser pulses, with pulse widths shorter than of one nanosecond, that are operated at optical peak powers at or above 1 kilowatt. And these effects become substantial when peak pulse optical power levels are in the range of 5 to 10 kiloWatts or greater.

With the benefit of this new insight into FSO communications, it become apparent why the unsubstantiated claims in the expired Motorola patent (U.S. Pat. No. 6,043,920) continued to be so controversial over the years. The beneficial effects of using femtosecond pulses can only be realized when using a laser source with a high peak optical power in the range of 1 kilowatt or greater and preferably in the range of 10 kilowatt or greater. And it should be clearly noted that all of the claims in Motorola's patent are limited to “applying the modulated [electrical] pulse stream to a [CW] laser [beam] to generate laser pulses wherein a pulse width of each pulse of the pulse stream is under 200 femtoseconds; and directing the laser optical pulses through the lossy medium towards a detector.” The reality is that the only way one could satisfy these conditions would be to start with a CW laser having an average output power of at least 1 kilowatt from which pulses of less than 200 femtoseconds could be carved using an external optical beam modulator. Such a high power laser would be impractical to build and operate and far too expensive for use in commercial FSO communication systems. However, the use of USPL sources in FSO communication systems with much more modest average output powers yet very high peak pulse powers in excess of 1 kilowatt is the essence of the current invention. This leads to an unexpected improvement in atmospheric transmission over the use of continuous wave (CW) lasers and lower power pulsed lasers of all types.

It should be pointed out that the spectral width of the pulses from an USPL can have considerable width. For example, an USPL with a central wavelength of 1560 nm might have a spectral bandwidth that extends for several hundred nanometers or more. This is due to a fundamental reciprocal relationship between the minimum frequency spectral width, Δf, of the pulses from any laser and its temporal pulse width, Δt. That is, Δf=1/Δt. And since the wavelength, A, is defined by the relationship is λ=c/f, where c is the speed of light in a vacuum and f is the laser's central frequency, differentiating this relationship results in Δλ=(−c/f2)Δf=−(λ²/c)(1/Δt). For example, if λ=1560 nm and the pulse width. At, is 20 femtoseconds, then using this equation, the minimum spectral width, Δλ would be equal to 406 nm. Similarly, for a 10 femtosecond pulse width USPL the minimum spectral width would be twice as great, 812 nm. And for a USPL with a 100 femtosecond pulse width would have a minimum spectral width of 81 nm.

The following summarizes the key results that have been observed:

-   -   1. Unforeseen Benefit of Propagation of the USPL Pulses through         Clear Air Atmospheric Effects: ^(˜)30 dB+ improvements in USPL         link margin (versus CW laser) of ‘intended’ center wavelength         (1550 nm) through clear air atmospheric effects (scintillation,         beam wander, turbulence,     -   2. Unforeseen Benefit of Propagation of the USPL Pulses Through         Water Aerosols (Fog, Clouds, etc.): 30 dB+ improvements in USPL         link margin (versus CW laser) of ‘intended’ center wavelength         (1550 nm) through water aerosols (fog, clouds, etc.).     -   3. Wavelength Shifting to ‘Deeper Infrared’ Wavelengths in Dense         Water Aerosols: In heavy water aerosols (sometimes ‘at or         approaching’ ^(˜)100 to ^(˜)150 dB per kilometer attenuation),         and after the CW laser beam had been attenuated to below its         level of detection (i.e. below the noise floor of the optical         power meter) and after the most powerful portion of the USPL         output spectrum (centered at 1550 nm) had also been attenuated         to below its level of detection, a remaining 1571 nm portion of         the USPL beam (launched 5 dB lower average power than 1550 nm         part of the spectrum) was fully 15 dB above the level of         detection and steady (low levels of fluctuation in time).     -   4. Unforeseen Benefits in USPL Pulse Received Peak-to-Fade′         Power Levels: Received power fluctuations in the USPL         beam—either during periods of lower attenuation but most         critically, during periods of increasing or decreasing         attenuation due to weather effects—were substantially less, by         10's of dBs, over very short periods (typically periods of one         second) as compared with the power fluctuations in the CW laser         beam), and     -   5. Benefit of Impulsive Coding Using a True Discrete         Return-to-Zero High-Peak-Power Pulse: Improvements of up to and         beyond 10 dB in link margin improvements at the optical detector         by using ultrashort pulses as the signal carrier in         ‘impulsive-coding’ modulation of any kind.

It should also be noted that the above benefits significantly contributed either singly or in combination to substantially improve the overall availability of the USPL communication and sensor systems.

The subject matter described herein can be embodied in systems, apparatus, methods, and/or articles depending on the desired configuration. The implementations set forth in the foregoing description do not represent all implementations consistent with the subject matter described herein. Instead, they are merely some examples consistent with aspects related to the described subject matter. Although a few variations have been described in detail above, other modifications or additions are possible. In particular, further features and/or variations can be provided in addition to those set forth herein. For example, the implementations described above can be directed to various combinations and sub-combinations of the disclosed features and/or combinations and sub-combinations of several further features disclosed above. In addition, the logic flows depicted in the accompanying figures and/or described herein do not necessarily require the particular order shown, or sequential order, to achieve desirable results.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, show certain aspects of the subject matter disclosed herein and, together with the descriptions, help explain some of the principles associated with the disclosed implementations. In all cases where USPLs are shown or discussed, it should be assumed that the peak output power from these lasers is one kWatt or greater and that their pulse widths are one nanosecond or less.

FIG. 1 depicts an example of an optical communications platform including free-space coupling of a USPL source as an optical source for transport to a remote optical receive terminal;

FIG. 2 depicts an example of an optical communications platform including fiber coupling of a USPL source as an optical source for transport to a remote optical receive terminal;

FIG. 3 depicts an example of an optical communications platform including fiber coupling of a USPL source to an external modulator for transport to a remote optical receive terminal;

FIG. 4 depicts an example of an optical communications platform including fiber coupling of a USPL source to an external modulator through a fiber medium for transport to a remote optical receive terminal;

FIG. 5 depicts an example of a transmitting and or receiving elements, which can be of a type from either the Hyperbolic Mirror Fabrication Techniques or conventional Newtonian designs;

FIG. 6 depicts an example of an optical fiber amplifier element identified and used to increase enhancing optical transmit launch power for transport to a remote optical receive terminal;

FIG. 7 depicts an example of a USPL laser device that is fiber coupled to an external modulator for transport, in a point-to-point configuration for transport to a remote optical receive terminal;

FIG. 8 depicts an example of a USPL laser device that is fiber coupled to an external modulator for transport, in a point-to-Multi-point configuration;

FIG. 9 depicts an example of use of USPL sources acting as tracking and alignment (pointing) beacon sources;

FIG. 10 depicts an example of a USPL laser sources polarization multiplexed onto a transmitted optical signal, to provide Polarization Multiplex USP-FSO (PM-USP-FSO) functionality;

FIG. 11A and FIG. 11B respectively depict examples of USPL-FSO transceivers utilized for use in line-of-sight and non-line-of-sight lasercom applications;

FIG. 12 depicts an example of light including light from the data signal propagated forward being backscattered by interaction with air-borne particulates that are the subject of investigation;

FIG. 13 depicts an example of USPL laser sources as optics reception techniques to improve detection sensitivity consistent with an implementation of the current subject matter; USPL laser sources as well as optical reception techniques to improve detection sensitivity.

FIG. 14 depicts an example of a USPL-FSO transceiver utilized and operated across the infrared wavelength range optionally including light from the data signal as a range-finder and spotting apparatus for the purposes of target identification;

FIG. 15 depicts an example of a USPL pulse multiplier device consistent with implementations of the current subject matter;

FIG. 16 depicts another example of a device for generation of high pulse rate USPL optical streams consistent with implementations of the current subject matter;

FIG. 17 depicts another example of an optical device to a generate a USPL RZ data stream from a conventional transmission networking element;

FIG. 18 depicts an example of a implementing a USPL pulse multiplier device for generation of 10×TDM type signals system to give a 100 Gbps output;

FIG. 19 depicts an example of a implementing another type of USPL pulse multiplier device for extending the pulse repetition rate for use in high capacity networks;

FIG. 20 depicts an example of a implementing another type of USPL pulse multiplier device for extending the pulse repetition rate for use in high capacity networks;

FIG. 21 depicts examples of active mode-locked linear fiber lasers with feedback regenerative systems: fiber reflector (FR), wavelength-division multiplexer (WDM), Erbium-doped fiber (EDF), optical coupler (OC), photo-detector (PD), phase-locked loop (PLL), and Mach-Zehnder Modulator (MZM);

FIG. 22 and FIG. 23 depict examples of passive mode-locked linear fiber lasers using a carbon nano-tubes saturable absorber: fiber reflector (FR), wavelength-division multiplexer (WDM), Erbium-doped fiber (EDF), optical coupler (OC), and saturable absorber (SA);

FIG. 24 depicts an example of a time-delay stabilization mechanism: optical coupler (OCin, OCout), photo-detector (PDin, PDout), high-pass filter (HPF), low-pass filter (LPF), phase-locked loop (PLL), phase-comparator (PC), frequency-divider (1/N), clock-data recovery system (CDR), piezoelectric actuator (PZ1 . . . PZN), summing op amp, for use in stabilizing the optical pulse to pulse relationship produced from the USPL source;

FIG. 25A and FIG. 25B respectively include a schematic diagram and a graph relating to an example of a controlling mechanism to stabilize the output frequency of TDM sources utilizing an idealized PZ actuator;

FIG. 26 depicts an example of a Time-Domain Multiplexing (TDM) where the TDM multiplexes a pulse train using parallel time delay channels, having the delay channels to be “consistent” relative to each another (Because the frequency of an output multiplexed pulse train is ideally as insensitive as possible to environmental changes, a feedback loop control system can correct the delay units for any fluctuations which compromise the stability of the output rep rate, and feedback can be provides through interconnection to a Neural Network);

FIG. 27 depicts an example of use of fiber based collimators along with Piezoelectric transducers for controlling individual MFC circuits;

FIG. 28 depicts an example of timing of the TDM chip from the USPL modulation source to provide a Terabit/second (or faster) with a Multiplier Photonic chip;

FIG. 29 depicts an example of timing of the TDM chip from the USPL modulation source to provide a Terabit/second (or faster) with a Multiplier Photonic chip operating in a WDM configuration;

FIG. 30 depicts an example of construction of a computer assisted system, which can control the pulse width of an all-fiber mode-locked laser using recursive linear polarization adjustments with simultaneous stabilization of the cavity's repetition rate using a synchronous self-regenerative mechanism and can also offer tunability of the repetition rate, and pulse width;

FIG. 31 depicts an example of a modified pulse interleaving scheme, by a pulse multiplication technique, in which the lower repetition rate pulse train of a well-characterized, well-mode locked laser can be coupled into an integrated-optical directional coupler, where a well-determined fraction of the pulse is tapped off and “re-circulated” in an optical loop with an optical delay equal to the desired inter-pulse spacing in the output pulse train, and re-coupled to the output of the directional coupler;

FIG. 32 is a process flow chart illustrating features of a method consistent with implementations of the current subject matter;

FIG. 33 is another process flow chart illustrating features of a method consistent with implementations of the current subject matter; and

FIG. 34 is another process flow chart illustrating features of a method consistent with implementations of the current subject matter.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

FIG. 1 illustrates an example of an optical communications platform 100 consistent with an implementation of the current subject matter for using an USPL device that is free-space coupled as an optical source for transport. As shown in FIG. 1 , a USPL source 102 is directly modulated by an external source element 104. Optical power from the USPL source 102 can be coupled across free space 110 to a transmitting element 106, optionally by an optical telescope. The transmitting element 106 can optionally include optical components formed by hyperbolic mirror fabrication techniques, conventional Newtonian designs, or the like. A reciprocal receiving telescope at a receiver system can provide for optical reception. Consistent with implementations of the current subject matter, each optical transport platform can be designed to operate as a bi-directional unit. In other words, the transmitting element 106 of the optical communications platform 100 can also function as a receiving element. In general, unless otherwise explicitly stated, a transmitting element 106 as described can be considered to also be functional as a receiving element and vice versa. An optical element that performs both transmission and receiving functions can be referred to herein as an optical transceiver.

FIG. 2 illustrates an example of an optical communications system 200 consistent with an implementation of the current subject matter that includes the optical communications platform 100 of FIG. 1 . Also shown in FIG. 2 is a second complementary receiving element 204, which can be a receiving telescope located at a remote distance from the transmitting element 106. As noted above, both the transmitting element 106 and the receiving element 204 can be bi-directional, and each can function as both a transmitting element 106 and a receiving element 204 depending on the instantaneous direction of data transmission in the optical communications system 200. This feature applies throughout this disclosure for transmitting and receiving elements unless otherwise explicitly stated. Either or both of the transmitting element 106 and the receiving element 204 can be optical telescopes or other devices for transmitting and receiving optical information.

FIG. 3 illustrates an example of an optical communications platform 300 consistent with an implementation of the current subject matter for using an USPL source 102 fiber coupled to an external modulator 302 through a fiber medium 304 and connected to a transmitting element 106 through an additional transmission medium 306, which can optionally be a fiber medium, a free space connection, etc. The USPL source 102 can be externally modulated by the external modulator 302 such that optical power from the USPL source 102 is fiber coupled to the transmitting element 106 or handled via an equivalent optical telescope.

FIG. 4 illustrates an example of an optical communications system 400 consistent with an implementation of the current subject matter that includes the optical communications platform 300 of FIG. 3 . Also shown in FIG. 4 is a second complementary receiving telescope 204, which, as noted above in relation to FIG. 2 , can be a receiving telescope located at a remote distance from the transmitting element 106.

FIG. 5 illustrates an example of an optical communications architecture 500 consistent with an implementation of the current subject matter. The architecture 500 of FIG. 5 includes the elements of FIG. 4 and further includes a first communication network 502 connected to a first optical communications platform 300. The receiving element 204 is part of a second optical communications platform 504, which can optionally include components analogous to those of the first optical communications platform 300. A second communications network 506 can be connected to the second optical communications platform 504 such that the data transmitted optically between the transmitting element 106 and the receiving element 204 or are passed between the first and second communications networks 502, 506, which can each include one or more of optical and electrical networking features.

FIG. 6 illustrates an example of an optical communications system 600 consistent with an implementation of the current subject matter. As part of an optical communications platform 602, an USPL source 102 is fiber coupled to an external modulator 302, for example through an optical fiber 202 or other transmission medium. The light from the USPL source 102 is propagated via a transmitting element 106 in a similar manner as discussed above. An optical amplifier element 604, which can optionally be an optical fiber amplifier element, can be used to increase optical transmit launch power, and can optionally be disposed between the external modulator 302 and the transmitting element 106 and connected to one or both via an additional transmission medium 306, which can optionally be a fiber medium, a free space connection, etc. Also shown in FIG. 6 is a second complementary receiving element 206 located at a remote distance from the optical communications platform 602. It will be readily understood that a second optical communications platform 504 that includes the receiving element 204 can also include an optical amplifier element 604. First and second communications networks 502, 506 can be connected respectively to the two optical communications platforms 602, 504.

FIG. 7 illustrates an example of an optical communications system 700 consistent with an implementation of the current subject matter. The optical communications platform 602 shown in FIG. 6 can be in communication with a second optical communications platform 702, which can in this implementation include a receiving element 204 and an optical preamplifier 704. Other components similar to those shown in the optical communications platform 602 can also be included in the second optical communications platform 702, although they are not shown in FIG. 7 . It will be understood that a bi-directional optical communications platform can include both of an optical preamplifier 704 for amplifying a received optical signal and an optical amplifier element 604 for boosting a transmitted optical signal. Consistent with the implementation depicted in FIG. 7 and other implementations of the current subject matter, optical amplification (e.g. for either or both of an optical amplifier element 604 or an optical preamplifier 704) be included for enhancing the optical budget for the data-link between the transmitting element 106 and the receiving element 204 (and vice versa), for example using one or more of an erbium-doped fiber amplifier (EDFA), a high power erbium-ytterbium doped fiber amplifier (Er/Yb-DFA), or equivalents, which can include but are not limited to semiconductor-optical-amplifiers (SOA).

FIG. 8 illustrates an example of an optical communications system 800 consistent with an implementation of the current subject matter. The optical communications platform 602 shown in FIG. 6 can be in communication with a second optical communications platform 802, which can in this implementation include a receiving element 204 and an optical preamplifier 704 similar to those shown in FIG. 7 . As shown in FIG. 8 , the second optical communications platform 802 can further include optical receiver circuitry 804, which can receive amplified and electrically recovered data received at the receiving element 204 and amplified by the optical preamplifier. A plurality of clock sources 806 can interface to multiple remote multi-point network connections with a plurality of communications networks 810 as required. In a similar manner, a complementary set of clock sources and multiple communication networks can be operated in conjunction with the optical communications platform 602 (e.g. in place of the single depicted communication network 502 in FIG. 8 .

FIG. 9 illustrates an example of an optical communications system 900 consistent with an implementation of the current subject matter. An optical communications platform 902, which can feature similar elements to those in the optical communications platform 602 first discussed herein in reference to FIG. 6 , can also include an additional USPL source 904 acting as a tracking and alignment (pointing) beacon source. A second optical communications platform 906 can also include an additional USPL source 910 acting as a tracking and alignment (pointing) beacon source. The tracking and alignment (pointing) beacon sources 904, 910 can optionally originate from available communications sources used in data transport transmission, or can be provided by separate, dedicated USPL sources. In addition, each USPL beacon source 904, 910 can include an in-band or out-of-band source, thereby allowing the advantage of available optical amplification sources, or from dedicated optical amplification resources.

FIG. 10 illustrates an example of a FSO communication system 1000 that includes a dual polarization USPL-FSO optical data-link platform 1001 in which USPL sources are polarization multiplexed onto a transmitted optical signal to thereby provide polarization multiplexed USP-FSO (PM-USP-FSO) functionality. Two USPL sources 102 and 1002 are fiber coupled to either directly modulated or externally modulated modulation components 1004, 1006 respectively. Each respective modulated signal is optically amplified by an optical amplifier component 1010, 1012 followed by adjustment of optical polarization states using polarization components 1014, 1016. The polarization state signals are fiber coupled to a polarization dependent multiplexer (PDM) component 1020 for interfacing to an optical launch platform component 1022, which can be similar to the transmit element 106 discussed above. The PDM 1020 multiplexes the light of differing polarization states into a single pulse train for transmission via the optical launch platform component 1022. An USPL optical beacon 904 can be included to provide capabilities similar to those discussed above in reference to FIG. 9 , for example to operate along or in conjunction with a second USPL optical beacon 906 at a receiving platform 1024, which can include a receiving element 204 similar to those described above. As previously noted, the receiving element 204 as well as other features and components of the receiving platform 1024 can generally be capable of supporting transmission functions such that a bi-directional link is established. A received signal recovered by the receiving element 204 can provide an optical signal that is interfaced to an appropriate polarization dependent de-multiplexer 1026 capable of providing two signals for further optical amplification using amplification elements 1030, 1032. Each optical amplified signal as provided by the amplification elements 1030, 1032 can be interfaced to an appropriate optical network 1034, 1036 for network usage.

FIG. 11A shows an example of a system 1100 in which USPL-FSO transceivers can be utilized for use in line-of-sight optical communication (e.g. “lasercom”) applications, and FIG. 11B shows an example of a system 1150 in which USPL-FSO transceivers can be utilized for use in non-line-of-sight lasercom applications. An advantage to some implementations of the current subject matter can be realized due to scattering of the optical signal sent from a transmit element as the transmitted light passes through the atmosphere. This scattering can permit the use of non-line-of-sight communication. In addition, radios used in such communication systems can operate in the solar-blind portion of the UV-C band, where light emits at a wavelength of 200 to 280 nm. In this band, when solar radiation propagates through the environment, it is strongly attenuated by the Earth's atmosphere. This means that, as it gets closer to the ground, the amount of background noise radiation drops dramatically, and low-power communications link operation is possible. On the other hand, environmental elements such as oxygen, ozone and water can weaken or interrupt the communications broadcast, limiting usage to short-range applications.

When UV waves spread throughout the atmosphere, they are typically strongly scattered into a variety of signal paths. Signal scattering is essential to UV systems operating in non-line-of-sight conditions, and the communications performance can highly dependent on the transmission beam pointing and the receiver's field of view. A line-of-sight arrangement 1100 as shown in FIG. 11A can differ in bandwidth size from a non-line-of-sight arrangement 1150 as shown in FIG. 11B. Ultraviolet communication can more strongly rely on a transmitter's beam position and a receiver's field of view. As a result, refining of the pointing apex angle, for example by experimenting with supplementary equipment to enhance the UV-C signal, can be advantageous.

FIG. 12 illustrates an example of a remote sensing system 1200 in which an USPL source 102 is fiber coupled by an optical fiber component 202 to an optical launch element 1202 capable of transmitting and receiving optical signals. Some of the light propagated forward including the light from data signal through the optical launch element 1202 is backscattered by interaction with air-borne particulates that are the subject of investigation. The optical backscattered signal is detected through the optical launch element 1202 or a similar receive aperture and passed along for detection and spectrographic analysis through detection circuitry 1204 or the like in FIG. 12 . The signature of particulates within a target atmospheric region 1206 within which an investigation is made can be calibrated through conventional approaches, for example using predetermined spectrographic calibration measurements based on one or more of ultraviolet spectroscopy, infrared spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, etc. Consistent with this implementation, an optical system can be operated as a LiDAR instrument providing enhanced resolution and detection sensitivity performance, using USPL laser sources operating over a spectral range of interest. Adjustability of spectral range can aid in evaluating and analyzing chemical constituents in the atmosphere.

USPL-FSO transceivers can be utilized for remote sensing and detection for signatures of airborne elements using ionization or non-ionization detection techniques, utilizing optical transport terminals manufactured through either the Hyperbolic Mirror Fabrication Techniques or conventional Newtonian designs that focus a received signal at one ideal point. Also certain adaptations can be related to ionization probing of remote regions include controllable ionization, which has been shown to occur at these frequencies and an ionization process, which can be focused at distance to adjust depth of atmospheric penetration especially in weather and clouds.

FIG. 13 illustrates an example of use of USPL sources as well as optical reception techniques to improve detection sensitivity. Researchers at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), US, have built a laser ranging system that can pinpoint multiple objects with nanometer precision over distances up to 100 km. The LIDAR (light detection and ranging) system could have applications from precision manufacturing on Earth to maintaining networks of satellites in perfect formation (Nature Photonics DOI: 10.1038/NPHOTON.2009.94). The NIST device uses two coherent broadband fiber-laser frequency combs. Frequency combs output a series of stable short pulses that also contain a highly coherent carrier that extends across the pulse train. This means a frequency comb can be employed to simultaneously make an interferometric measurement as well as a time-of-flight measurement, thereby enhancing analytical capabilities for application specific situations.

In the arrangement shown in FIG. 13 , two phase-locked frequency combs 1301 and 1302 are used in a coherent linear optical sampling configuration, also known as a multi-heterodyne, meaning that one frequency comb measures both distance paths, while the other frequency comb provides distance information encoded in the light of the first comb. Pulses from one frequency comb 1301 can be launched out of the fiber and directed towards two glass plates, a reference 1303 and a target 1304. The plates 1303 and 1304 can reflect a certain fraction (e.g. approximately 4%) of the pulse back down the fiber, effectively creating two new pulses. The time separation between the two pulses 1301 can give the distance between the moveable target plate and reference plates. A second frequency comb 1302 is tightly phase-locked with the first, but has a slightly different repetition rate. Due to the different delay between consecutive pulses when the sources interfere, the second frequency comb can sample a slightly different part of the light from the electric field of the first comb.

Using the technique described is reference to FIG. 13 , can make possible the replacement of two coherent broadband fiber-laser sources with two appropriate USPL sources used within the scope of the configuration outlined having each USPL source fiber coupled to dedicated free-space optical telescope designs. By doing so, the overall efficiency, optical ranging and accuracy can be improved substantially.

Currently available USPL optical pulse trains operate at the native pulse repetition rates of the USPL laser source and are typically limited to 50 MHz or less, thereby capping the maximum data rates for optical transmission. As a result the optical system utilizing USPL laser sources is restricted to low data rate applications of 50 Mbps or less. Having the means to increase USPL operational rates is necessary for providing solutions for data transport in excess of 50 Mbps.

FIG. 14 illustrates an example of a remote sensing system 1400 in which an USPL source 102 is fiber coupled by an optical fiber component 202 to an optical launch element 1202 capable of transmitting and receiving optical signals. Light propagated forward by the optical launch element 1202 including light from the data signal is backscattered by interaction with targets known and unknown that are the subject of investigation within an atmospheric region 1206. The optical backscattered signal including light from the data signal is detected through the optical launch element 1202 or a similar receive aperture and passed along for detection analysis through a detection circuitry and spectrographic analysis component 1402 in FIG. 14 . The signature of particulates within the region 1206 under investigation can be calibrated, for example where range-finding analysis can be performed. A system 1400 as in FIG. 14 can include a USPL-FSO transceiver utilized and operated across the infrared wavelength range as a range-finder and spotting apparatus for the purposes of target identification and interrogation applications.

FIG. 15 illustrates an optical pulse multiplier module 1500 that can increase the repetition rate of the output from a USPL source 102. A typical USPL with a pulse width of 10-100 femto-seconds has a repetition rate of, for example, 50 MHz. The output from the USPL 102 can be fed as an input 1502 into a USPL photonic chip pulse multiplier module 1504. In this example, the photonic chip can contain a 20,000:1 splitter element 1506 that splits the input into discrete light elements. Each light element on the opposite side of the splitter element 1506 contains the 50 MHz pulse train. Each light element then passes through a delay controller (either a fiber loop or lens array) 1510, which delays the pulse train for that element in time, for example by a number of picoseconds. Successive light elements are thereby delayed by incremental picoseconds. All of these pulse trains with their unique time delays are combined into a single pulse train in a fashion similar to time division multiplexing utilizing a 20,000:1 optical combiner element 1512. The required ratios of splitters and combiners can be controlled to provide necessary optical designs for the application required. The final output 1514 is a pulse train of 10-100 femto-second pulses with a repletion rate of 1 THz. This THz pulse train can then be modulated by a 10 or 100 GigE signal, such as shown in FIG. 28 , resulting in 100 femto-second pulses per bit for the 10 GigE system, and 10 femto-second pulses per bit for 100 GigE systems. The application cited is not limited to specific data rates of 10 and 100 Gbps, but can operate as required by the application under considerations. These numbers are just for illustration purposes. Implementations of the current subject matter can use any multiplier factor to increase the repetition rate of the USPL via the photonic chip pulse multiplier module 1504 to any arbitrary repetition rate. Other examples used in generation of enhanced USPL repetition rates are illustrated within this submission.

FIG. 16 depicts a system 1600 for generation, transmission, and receiving of high pulse rate USPL optical streams. An optical chip multiplexing module 1610, which can for example be similar to that discussed in reference to FIG. 15 , can be used in this application. In this approach to achieve USPL pulse multiplication, a series of 10 GigE router connections (10 GigE is not intended to be a limiting feature) described by signals 1601, 1602, 1603, 1604 (four signals are shown in FIG. 16 , but it will be understood that any number is within the scope of the current subject matter) are interfaced to the optical chip multiplexing module 1610. In operation, the optical chip multiplexing module 1610 can support full duplex (Tx and Rx) to connect with the 10 GigE routers 1601, 1602, 1603, 1604. The optical chip multiplexing module 1610 can provide efficient modulation by a USPL signal 1685 output from a USPL source 1690 for ingress optical signals 1601, 1602, 1603, 1604. The optical chip multiplexing module 1610 can provide capabilities to modulate and multiplex these ingress optical signals.

At a remote receive site where a receiving device is positioned, all signals sent via a transmitting element 1660 at the transmitting device can be recovered using an appropriate receiver element 1665. A complementary set of optical chip multiplexing module 1675 can provide necessary capabilities for demultiplexing the received data stream as shown by elements for delivery to a series of routers 1601′, 1602′, 1603′, 1604′ (again, the depiction of four such routers is not intended to be limiting). End-to-end network connectivity can be demonstrated through network end-point elements.

FIG. 17 depicts an example system 1700 in which an optical chip is interconnected to a wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) system, currently available versions of which can be very expensive. WDM systems have the advantage of not requiring timing or synchronization as needed with a 10 GigE (or other speed) router 1701, since each 10 GigE signal runs independent of other such signals on its own wavelength. Timing or synchronization of the TDM optical chip with 10 GigE routers can be important in a TDM optical chip. A GbE switch 1701 can provide the necessary electrical RF signal 1705, from the switch 1701 to modulate a USPL source 1702, either directly or by use of USPL a pulse multiplier module previously detailed within this document. A typical RZ output 1710 can be coupled into a external modulator 1720, which can be modulated using a NRZ clock source for the switch 1701, thereby resulting in a RZ modulated spectrum 1730. The conversion process using readily available equipment can provide capabilities for introducing USPL sources and their benefits into the terrestrial backhaul network spectrum.

For the optical chip system to successfully bridge between two remote 10 GigE switches, it must typically act like a simple piece of fiber. The timing of the TDM chip can therefore be driven by the 10 GigE switch 1701. Both actively mode-locked USPLs (i.e. 40 GHz, 1 picosecond pulse width) and passively mode-locked USPLs (i.e. 50 MHz, 100 femtosecond pulse width) can be driven by a RF timing signal.

FIG. 18 illustrates a device 1800 that can support another approach to progression to a high pulse repetition data rate operation, such as for extremely high data rate operation in which optical chip design can be performed using either fiber or free-space optics. A 50 MHz USPL source 1801 is interfaced to a series of optical delay controller elements 1802, which can be designed using either fiber loops or offset lenses, to result in producing exactly a 10.313 Gbps RZ output stream, which is the 10 GigE line rate (greater than 10 Gbps because of 64B/66B encoding). A splitter element 1803 provides splitting functionality of the incoming optical signal train 1801 into (in this example) 206 paths, along with variable optical delay lines 1804. After sufficient delay is introduced through design all signals are multiplexed together through a combiner element 1805. In so doing a series of optical signals each identical, and equally spaced between adjacent pulses form a continuum of pulses for modulation. Prior to entering an E-O modulator element 1806, all optical ingress signals can be conditioned by pre-emphasis techniques, for example using typical optical amplification techniques, to result in a uniform power spectrum for each egress signal from the combiner element 1805. The conditioned egress signals are then coupled into the E-O modulator element 1806 and modulated with an available NRZ signal from the 10 GigE signal source element 1807. The 10 GigE modulated output 1809 can interface to an EDFA and then into the TX of a FSO system (or a fiber optic system). The Rx side (after the detector) can be fed directly into a 10 GigE switch as a modulated and amplified output 1810.

FIG. 19 illustrates another example of a device 1900 that can be used for USPL pulse multiplication consistent with implementations of the current subject matter. Consistent with this approach, a 10×TDM system is configured to give a 100 Gbps output. A TDM demux chip can be on the receive side of a communication link to break up the individual 10 GigE signals, and can include a reciprocal approach to the design shown in FIG. 19 .

As in FIG. 18 , a 50 MHz USPL source 1801 is interfaced to a series of optical delay controller elements 1802, which can be designed using either fiber loops or offset lenses, to result in producing exactly a 10.313 Gbps RZ output stream, which is the 10 GigE line rate (greater than 10 Gbps because of 64B/66B encoding). A splitter element 1803 provides splitting functionality of the incoming optical signal train 1801 into (in this example) 206 paths, along with variable optical delay lines 1804. After sufficient delay is introduced through design all signals are multiplexed together through a combiner element 1805. Instead of a single modulator element 1806 as shown in FIG. 18 , however, the 10.313 GHz RZ output 1901 from the combiner element 1805 is fed into a second splitter element 1910, which in this case can be a 10× splitter, which splits the optical signal into ten parallel paths. Other implementations of this design can support various split ratios as required by design. Optical paths out from second splitter element 1910 are individually connected to specified optical delay lines 1920. Each individual delayed path is connected to a dedicated optical modulator of a set of optical modulators 1930 modulated with an available NRZ signal from the 10×10 GigE signal source element 1931, resulting in a series of modulated optical signals 1935. An optical combiner identified 1940 provides a single optical pulse train 1950. The series of optical pulses in the single optical pulse train 1950 can be interfaced to an appropriate optical amplifier for desired optical conditioning for network use.

FIG. 20 illustrates another example of a device 2000 that can be used for USPL pulse multiplication consistent with implementations of the current subject matter. A device 2000 as depicted can provide the ability to achieve high USPL pulse repetition data rates for network applications by modulation of the low repetition rate intra-channel pulses. By applying direct modulation of each channel on the delay controller, creation of a modulation scheme, which is not constrained by the current speed limitations from the electronics technology, can be beneficially accomplished. Implementations of the current subject matter can provide a mechanism to enhance the data transmission capacity of a system, by separately modulating individual channels at the current standard electronic modulation speed (in the example of FIG. 20 at the rate of 100×10 GigE signal input 2001) and time-multiplexing the channels into a single frequency high rep rate pulse stream. In this approach, the current standard, which is limited by the speed of electro-optic modulators (40 Gbps), can be enhanced by approximately N orders of magnitude, where N is the number of channels of the time-multiplexer. For example, a 100 channel TDM with each channel amplitude modulated at the current standard data rate can be able to offer data rates at speeds of up to 4 Tbs. N can be limited by the width of the optical pulse itself. In the limit that information is carried 1 bit/pulse, the time slot occupied by 1 bit is the width of the pulse itself (in that sense, RZ system would converge to a NRZ). For example, in the scheme, a 40 fs pulse width laser with a 40 GHz rep rate is able to carry information at a maximum rate of 25 Tbps. This approach can be used in a 40 Gbps-channel modulation scheme (i.e., 1 bit every 25 ps) and can correspond to a capacity of N^(˜)625 channels in a single transmission, which can be the number of 40 fs time intervals fitting in a 25 ps time interval. A significant advantage of this approach is the ability to “optically enhance” an otherwise limited data capacity modulation scheme, while still interfacing with the existing data rate limited modulators. For example, an amplitude modulator based on a Mach-Zehnder interferometer can be easily integrated in a TDM IC package, in that required is the ability to branch out the channel into two separate paths, add a tiny phase modulator (nonlinear crystal) in one of the paths, and combine the paths for interference.

FIG. 20 includes a USPL source 2010 coupled to a multi-port optical splitter element 2020. The number of optical ports identified need not be limited to those described or shown herein. A series of optical delay lines 2030 provide required optical delays between each parallel path from the multi-port optical splitter element 2020, and can be tailored for specific applications. The optical delay paths from the optical delay lines 2030 are summed together using an optical combiner element 2035. The resulting combined optical data stream appearing through element 2040 represents a multiplicative enhancement in the pulse repetition rate of the original USPL source identified by element 2010. Further enhancement in pulse repetition rate is accomplished though the usage of element 2041, described by an optical splitter where the incoming signal 2040 is split into a series of paths not limited to those identified by element 2041. By way of a second delay controller 2045, optical delays may be introduced to each path within the device as identified by the second set of optical delay paths 2042. Each parallel path 2042 in turn is modulated by a modulating element 2044 with an available RF signal source element identified by the signal input 2001. An optical combiner element 2050 integrates all incoming signals onto a single data stream 2060.

Optical pre-emphasis and de-emphasis techniques can be introduced within each segment of elements described to custom tailor the optical spectrum for a uniform or asymmetric optical power distribution. Pre- & de-emphasis can be accomplished using commonly used optical amplifiers such as Er-Doped Optical amplifiers (EDFA).

FIG. 21 depicts an example of a system 2100 that includes a mode-locked USPL source 2101, which can be used to generate appropriately required clock and data streams for the application. Mode-locked lasers can represent a choice of high performance, high finesse source for clocks in digital communication systems. In this respect, mode-locked fiber lasers—in either linear or ring configuration—can make an attractive candidate of choice, as they can achieve pulse widths on the USPL source region and repetition rate as high as GHz. In addition to that, fibers offer compactness, low cost, low sensitivity to thermal noise, low jitter, no problems associated with diffraction or air dust pollution, just to name a few. In a communications scenario, the pulse width can determine the available bandwidth of the system, and the repetition rate limits the data rate. The pulse width can be determined by the intrinsic characteristics of the laser cavity—i.e. balancing of the overall group-velocity dispersion (GVD), and the choice of the saturable absorber (in the case of a passive system)—or the bandwidth of an active element (in the case of an active mode-locked system). The repetition rate of the pulse train is constrained by the length of the fiber. For example, in a linear laser, the fundamental mode vos, of the laser can be expressed as:

$v_{osc} = \frac{c}{2n_{g}L}$

-   -   where c is the speed of light in vacuum, n g is the average         group index, and L is the length of the cavity. Therefore, a 10         cm long fiber laser cavity element 2110 with an average group         index of 1.47 would have a repetition rate of 1 GHz. In strictly         passive systems, mode-locking can be achieved through the use of         a saturable absorber. In an active laser, an amplitude modulator         element 2150 can be inserted in the cavity to increase the         repetition rate of the laser (harmonic mode locking). In order         to achieve high repetition rate clocks using mode-locked USPL         source, it is possible to use one or more of (i) an intra-cavity         amplitude Mach-Zehnder modulator (MZM) 2150 as shown in FIG. 21         and (ii) a low threshold saturable absorber. These techniques,         known as “harmonic mode-locking”, can be utilized within a fiber         based plant distribution system or within a FSO system, for         terrestrial, submarine or FSO system either in; air, space or         submarine applications.

Detailed within FIG. 21 is 980 nm pump element 2102 coupled to an optical WDM device 2105. An erbium doped optical amplifier 2110 or equivalent can be used to create a non-linear environment to obtain a mode-locked pulse train emission within a closed cavity established between two Faraday reflectors 2101 and 2160 on either end of the optical USPL cavity. Operation of the device is capable of establishing a self-contained series of optical pulse in excess of 100 Gbps, and highly synchronized in nature at the output port 2170 of the module. In order to achieve a high gain non-linear medium the EDFA 2110 can be specially designed. A phase lock loop 2130 can provide advantageous stability in operation by maintaining a synchronized clock source through modulation of the signal through components 2120, 2130, 2150 of the self-contained high-repetition rate pulse generator.

To achieve high rep rates in a laser that is limited by its dimensions (length in the case of a linear laser and perimeter in the case of a ring laser), it can be necessary to stimulate intra-cavity generation of the multiples of the fundamental mode. In the active case, an amplitude modulator inserted in the cavity modulates the loss of the system operating as a “threshold gating” device. For this approach to be successful, it can be necessary that the controlling signal to the modulator be referenced to the oscillation of the laser itself to avoid the driving signal “forcing” an external frequency of oscillation on the laser. This can be realized by the introduction of a phase-lock-loop element 2130, or a synchronous oscillator circuit to track-and-lock onto the repetition rate of the laser, and regenerate the signal. In the case of a PLL, the RF output can be set to a multiple of the input signal (much as this device is used in cell phone technology), and the rep rate of the laser increased. The signal can then be used for triggering of a pulse generator, or in conjunction with a low-pass filter. A MZ amplitude modulator 2150 outside the laser cavity can be used to create On-Off Keying (OOK) modulation on the pulse train coming out of the mode-locked laser.

FIG. 22 shows a graphical depiction 2200 illustrating effects of a loss modulation introduced to the input pulse train 2201 due to the presence of the amplitude modulator 2205 with a controlling signal NRZ signal 2210 made of a bit sequence as illustrated. The resulting signal at the output of the device 2220 represents an NRZ to RZ converter device for use in telecommunications and scientific applications where the application may benefit from RZ data streams. A clock signal 2201 (optical input) at a given pulse repetition rate will pass through the modulator 2205. At the same time, a controlling signal consisting of a sequence of 1's and 0's can be applied to the RF port of the modulator element 2215. When the modulator element 2215 is biased at minimum transmission, in the absence of a controlling signal the loss experienced by the optical signal can be at its maximum. In the presence of the RF signal (1's), the loss will drop to a minimum (OPEN GATE), thus working as an On-Off Keying modulation device. The pulse width of the output optical signal is typically much less than the time slot occupied by a single bit of information (even less than a half clock period of a NRZ scheme) making this system genuinely RZ as identified by element 2220.

FIG. 23 illustrates an example system 2300 for generation of high optical harmonic USPL pulse streams having high pulse repetition rate using a saturable absorber (SA) device 2330. The SA device 2330 can in some examples include carbon nano-tubes. Passive mode-locked fiber lasers using carbon nano-tubes SA (CNT-SA) make another attractive option for high rep rate sources due to their ability to generate high harmonics of the fundamental rep rate. In the approach described, a closed, self-contained optical cavity is established, in which two Faraday reflectors 2301 and 2350 form the optical cavity. Although a high-power erbium doped fiber amplifier (EDFA) 2310 is shown in FIG. 23 , any inverting medium producing a non-linear optical cavity can be used. A seed laser 2315, such as for example a 980 nm pump laser as shown in FIG. 23 can be used in generating a high-repetition rate optical train. In particular, any suitable pump laser may be considered in terms of optical wavelength and pulse repetition rate required. The SA element 2330 can be placed within the cavity to establish required optical pulse characteristics 2350 as required through design requirements.

FIG. 23 shows the schematics of an example of a laser that can be used in one or more implementations of the current subject matter. Unlike the active laser shown in FIG. 22 , here the MZ modulator can be replaced by the SA element 2330. A technique similar to those described herein can be utilized within a fiber based plant distribution system or within a FSO system, for terrestrial, submarine or FSO system either in air, space or submarine applications.

FIG. 24 illustrates an approach to providing time-domain multiplexing (TDM) where the TDM multiplexes a pulse train using parallel time delay channels. In some instances, it can become important to manipulate the delay channels such that they are “consistent” relative to each another. The frequency of the output multiplexed pulse train can ideally as much as possible be insensitive to environmental changes. For that, a proposed feedback loop control system is design to correct the delay units for any fluctuations which compromises the stability of the output rep rate.

FIG. 24 shows a diagram of an example of a delay control system 2400. The control loop can be implemented in one of several ways consistent with the current subject matter. FIG. 24 describes one possibility for illustration purposes. The input pulse train enters the TDM and multiplexes into N paths, each with its own delay line. If the paths are made of low “bending-loss” fiber waveguides, then each path can be coiled around a cylindrical piezoelectric actuator (PZ) of radius R. The actuators generally expand in a radial direction as a result of a controlling voltage (Vc). This expansion ΔR, which is linearly proportional to Vc, causes a change in length of the fiber ΔL=2πNΔR, where N is the number of fiber turns around the PZ. For Terahertz multiplexing, the delay between the pulses (and thus of PZ1) must be 1 picosecond. This can require a change in length equals to 200 microns, which, for a one turn PZ actuator corresponds to a ΔR=32.5 microns. Most commercially available piezoelectric actuators are highly linear and operate well within this range. The control mechanism can, therefore, be based on several PZ actuators, each with a number of turns corresponding to multiples of the first delay, i.e. (32, 64, 96 microns, etc.), and controlled by a single voltage Vc. The controlling voltage is determined by the feedback system, which compares the frequency of the output signal using a 1/N divider, with the frequency of the input signal, using a phase comparator (PC). The frequency of the “slow” input optical signal (represented by the waveform with τRT in FIG. 24 is converted to an RF signal using photo-detector PDin. In order to reduce the effects of electronic jitter, a “differentiator” (or high pass filter) can be applied to the RF signal as to steepen the leading edges of the pulses. A phase-locked loop is used to track-and-lock the signal, and to regenerate it into a 50% duty-cycle waveform. Likewise, in the output side, the optical signal is picked-up by photo-detector PDout, high-pass filtered, and regenerated using the clock output port of a clock-and-data recovery system. The clock of the output signal, which has a frequency N times the frequency of the input signal, is send to an N times frequency divider before going to the phase comparator. From the phase comparator, a DC voltage level representing the mismatch between the input and output signals (much as what is used in the architecture of PLL circuits) indicates the direction of correction for the actuators. A low-pass filter adds a time constant to the system to enhance its insensitivity to spurious noise.

A CDR can advantageously be used in the output, as opposed to a PLL such that the output signal may, or may not, be modulated. This system can be designed to work in both un-modulated, and “intra-TDM modulated” (i.e. one modulator at each delay path) schemes. However, this is a completely deterministic approach to compensating for variations on the length of the delay lines. Ideally, and within a practical standpoint, the delay paths should all be referenced to the same “thermal level” i.e. be sensitive to the same thermal changes simultaneously. In the event that each line senses different variation, this system would not be able to correct for that in real time.

In the alternative, a completely statistical approach can include summing of op amp circuits (S1 . . . SN) to deliver the controlling voltage to the actuators. Using such an approach, input voltages (V1 to VN) can be used to compensate for discrepancies in length between the lines, in a completely static sense, otherwise they can be used for initial fine adjustments to the system. The approach typically must also compensate or at least take into account any bending loss requirements of the fibers used. Some new fibers just coming out in the market may have a critical radius of only a few millimeters.

In the event that each path delay line senses different variation in temperature or experiences uncorrelated length changes due to spurious localized noise, the previously described approach, as is, may suffer from difficulties in performing a real time correction. A more robust approach operating in a completely statistical sense can be used consistent with some implementations of the current subject matter. In such an approach, summing op amp circuits (S1 . . . SN) can be used to deliver the controlling voltages to the actuators. In this case, the input voltages (V1 to VN) can be used to compensate for discrepancies in length between the delay lines in a completely statistical sense, otherwise they can only be useful for initial fine adjustments to the system (calibration).

Referring again to FIG. 24 , an incoming USPL source identified as element 2401 is coupled to an optical coupler element 2403, such that one leg of the coupler connects to an optical photodiode selected for operation at the operational data rate of 2401. Using standard electronic filtering techniques described by elements 2404, 2405, and 2406 an electrical square wave representation of the incoming USPL signal is extracted and identified by element 2407. The second optical leg of coupler 2403 is interfaced into an appropriate optical splitter element identified by 2410, where the incoming signal into 2410 is split into 206 parallel optical paths. Also illustrated are variable rate optical delay lines established in parallel for each of the parallel branches of the splitter element 2410. The parallel piezoelectric elements are identified by elements 242N and are controlled electronically through feedback circuitry within the diagram. A control voltage identified by Vc is generated through a photodiode 2485 along with electronic circuitry elements 2480 and 2475. The clock-and-data Recovery (CDR) element 2475 produces a clock source that is used in controlling each of the PZ elements. Optical paths identified as 244N are combined after a proper delay is introduced into each leg of element 2410. The pulse multiplied USPL signal 2490 is thereby generated.

FIG. 25A shows a schematic of a fiber PZ actuator 2500, and FIG. 25B shows a graph 2590 of radius vs. voltage for such an actuator. Together, these drawings illustrate operation of a PZ actuator for increasing the pulse repetition rate of an incoming USPL pulse train through induced optical delay. Although shown for use as an element for enhancing pulse repetition rate generation for USPL signals, the same technique can be used for other optical devices requiring or benefiting from optical delay. The basic structure for the device is a fiber based PZ actuator 2501. When a voltage 2550 is applied to electrodes 2520 a voltage induced stress results within the fiber, causing a time delay of the optical signal traveling through the fiber. By varying applied voltage a performance curve of optical delay vs. applied voltage is obtained as shown in the graph 2590 of FIG. 25B.

FIG. 26 shows a diagram illustrating features of an example statistical corrector 2600. The coarse correction controller 2640 shown in FIG. 26 corresponds to the system described in the previous section, which can correct for length variations simultaneously picked up by all delay lines. As mentioned, these variations are expected to occur in a time scale much slower than the “infra delay line” spurious variations. This latter effect can manifest itself as a period-to-period jitter introduced on the system. This type of jitter can be monitored using an RF Spectrum Analyzer (RFA), causing the rep rate line of the system to display “side lines” (or side bands), which are the result of the analyzer beating together noisy frequencies resulting from uneven time intervals between consecutive pulses. One such pattern can be processed using an analog-to-digital converter (ADC) and saved as an array of values, which can then be fed to a neural network (NN) machine. Neural network machines are known to possess excellent adaptability characteristics that allow them to essentially learn patterns from outside events by adapting to new set of input and outputs. A set of inputs in this case can be generated from a set of “imperfect observations”, i.e. “noisy” outputs of the TDM system as detected by the RFA and converted to digital arrays by the ADC ({f.sub.1, f.sub.2, . . . , f.sub.N}, where f.sub.i is a frequency component picked up by the RFA). A set of outputs can be generated from the corrections ({V.sub.1, V.sub.2, . . . , V.sub.N}, where V.sub.t is a compensating input voltage to the summing op amp) required to rid the output frequency set from the undesired excess frequency noise, which is due to the outside perturbations to the system. With a sufficiently large number of {f,V} pairs, where f, V are frequency, voltage arrays, one can build an statistical set to train the NN machine to learn the underlying pattern associated with the presence of the intra-channel noise. These machines can be found commercially in an IC format from several manufacturers, or implemented as software and used in conjunction with a computer feedback control mechanism. A single layer Perceptron type neural network, or ADALINE (Adaptive Linear Neuron or later Adaptive Linear Element), should be sufficient to accomplish the task.

Similar to the description provided above in relation to FIG. 24 , a statistical corrector element 2670 can include electronic circuitry that is similar to or that provides similar functionality as the electrical circuitry elements 2480 and 2475 and the photodiode 2485 of FIG. 24 . For the approach illustrated in FIG. 26 , a RF spectra analyzer 2695 along with a Neural Network 2670 and a Coarse Correction Controller element 2640 are used to perform the requirement of optical delay introduced into a parallel series of PZ elements 262N.

FIG. 27 illustrates concepts and capabilities of approaches consistent with implementations of the current subject matter in which performance, accuracy, and resolution can be improved through replacement of piezoelectric disk (PZ) modules identified by elements 2795 and 272N, where compact micro fiber based collimators (MFC) 2795 encircled by ceramic disks are used to obtain optical delay lines. Although illustrating a technique for increasing the native pulse repetition rate for a USPL pulse train, the design illustrated is not limited to such applications but can be applied or extended to other needs within the optical sector wherever optical delay is required. In so doing, a more controlled amount of temporal delay can be introduced within each MFC element of the circuit. The improvement through the use of utilizing MFC elements can improve response, resolution, and the achievement of reproducing in a rapid fashion required voltage responses in a mass production means. The concept identified within FIG. 27 can be incorporated into precisely produced elements that can serve as complementary paired units for use in reducing USPL pulse-to-pulse jitter as well as for the purposes of data encryption needs.

With further reference to FIG. 27 , a USPL source 2701 having a certain pulse repetition rate is split into a preselected number of optical paths 271N (which can number other than 206) as identified by splitter element 2705. An appropriately controlled delay 273N is introduced into each parallel leg of the split optical paths 271N using elements described by 2795 and 272N. The resulting delayed paths 274N are added together through an optical combiner element 2760. The pulse multiplied USPL signal 2780 results.

One potential disadvantage of some previously available TDM designs, in which fibers are “wrapped-around” the piezo actuators, is that the mechanism must comply with the bending loss requirements of the fibers used. Some new fibers just coming out in the market have critical radius of only a few millimeters. To correct for this issue, implementations of the current subject matter can use of micro-machined air-gap U-brackets in lieu of the fiber-wrapped cylindrical piezo elements. FIG. 27 illustrates this principle. In this approach, the piezoelectric actuators (PZ.sub.1, . . . PZ.sub.N) can be replaced by air gap U-bracket structures constructed using micro-fiber collimators (MFCs), and micro-rings made of a piezoelectric material. In this case, however, the piezoelectric actuator expands longitudinally, increasing (or decreasing) the air gap distance between the collimators, in response to the controlling voltages (V1, V2, . . . VN). As in the case of the cylindrical piezoelectric, a single voltage Vc can be use to drive all the piezoelectric devices, provided that the gains of each channel (G1, G2, . . . GN) are adjusted accordingly to provide the correct expansion for each line. Ideally, except for inherent biases to the system (i.e. intrinsic differences between op amps), the gain adjustments should be as G1, 2G1, 3G1, and so forth, in order to provide expansions, which are multiples of the TRT/N. Another way of implementing such an approach can be the use of multiple piezoelectric rings at the channels. In that manner, one can have channels with 1, 2, 3, N piezoelectric rings driven by the same voltage with all amplifiers at the same gain.

FIG. 28 provides a conceptual presentation of an optical chip system 2800 to successfully bridge between two remote 10 GigE switches. Ideally, such a connection can perform similarly to a simple piece of fiber. The timing of the TDM chip can be driven by the 10 GigE switch.

In reference to FIG. 28 , a USPL source 2805 having a predetermined native pulse repetition rate identified by 2806 connects to an optical Pulse multiplier chip 2807. Element 2807 is designed to convert the incoming pulse repetition rate signal 2806 into an appropriate level for operation with high-speed network Ethernet switches as identified by 2801. Switch 2801 provides a reference signal 2802 used to modulate signal 2809 by way of a standard electro-optic modulator 2820 at the data rate of interest. A resulting RZ optical signal is generated as shown in element 2840.

An alternative to having the timing run from the 10 GigE switch is to buildup the USPL to a Terabit/second (or faster) with a multiplier photonic chip, and then modulate this Terabit/second signal directly from the 10 GigE switch. Each bit will have 100 or so pulses. An advantage of this approach can be the elimination of a need for separate timing signals to be run from the switch to the USPL. The USPL via multiplier chip just has to pump out the Terabit/second pulses. Another advantage is that the output of the Multiplier Chip does not have to be exactly 10.313 or 103.12 Gbps. It just has to at a rate at about 1 Terabit/second. Where each 10 GigE bit has 100 or 101 or 99 pulses, this limitation is a non-issue. Another advantage is each bit will have many 10 USPL, so the 10 GigE signal will have the atmospheric propagation (fog and scintillation) advantage. Another advantage can be realized at the receiver end. It should be easier for a detector to detect a bit if that bit has 100 or so USPL pulses within that single bit. This could result in improved receiver sensitivity, and thus allow improved range for the FSO system. An additional advantage can be realized in that upgrading to 100 GigE can be as simple as replacing the 10 GigE switch with a 100 GigE switch. Each bit will have around 10 pulses in this case.

From a purely signal processing perspective this approach demonstrates an efficient way to send data and clock combined in a single transmission stream. Much like a “sampling” of the bits using an optical pulse stream, this approach has the advantage that the bit “size” is determined by the maximum number of pulses the it carries, therefore establishing a basis for counting bits as they arrive at the receiving end. In other words, if the bit unit has a time slot which can fit N pulses, the clock of the system can be established as “one new bit of information” after every 5.sup.th.

A technique similar to those described herein can be utilized within a fiber based plant distribution system or within a FSO system, for terrestrial, submarine or FSO system either in air, space or submarine applications, and illustrates for the first time how the interconnection from USPL sources to optical network elements is achieved for networking applications.

FIG. 29 shows a system 2900 that illustrates a conceptual network extension for the design concept reflected within FIG. 28 . As multiple USPL sources 2901, 2902, 2903 (it should be noted that while three are shown, any number is within the scope of the current subject matter), each modulated through dedicated optical switches and USPL laser Multiplier Chips circuits are configured in a WDM arrangement. As described in reference to FIG. 28 , electrical signals from each Ethernet switch can be used to modulate dedicated optical modulators 2911, 2922, 2928 for each optical path. Optical power for each segment of the system can be provided by optical amplification elements 2931, 2932, 2933 for amplification purposes. Each amplified USPL path can then be interfaced to an appropriate optical combiner 2940 for transport to a network 2950, and can be either free space or fiber based as required. The output from the WDM module can then be configured to a transmitting element 102 for FSO transport or into fiber plant equipment.

The technique described herein can be utilized within a fiber based plant distribution system or within a FSO system, for terrestrial, submarine or FSO system either in; air, space or submarine applications, and illustrates for the first time how the interconnection from USPL sources to optical network elements is achieved for networking applications.

FIG. 30 shows the schematics of an experimental setup for implementations of the current subject matter to include construction of a computer assisted system to control the pulse width of an all-fiber mode-locked laser using recursive linear polarization adjustments with simultaneous stabilization of the cavity's repetition rate using a synchronous self-regenerative mechanism. The design can also offer tune-ability of the repetition rate, and pulse width.

The fiber ring laser is represented by the inner blue loop, where all intra-cavity fiber branches are coded in blue, except for the positive high dispersion fiber outside the loop, which is part of the fiber grating compressor (coded in dark brown). The outside loops represent the feedback active systems.

FIG. 30 shows a diagram of a system 3000 illustrating features of an USPL module providing control of pulse width and pulse repetition rate control through mirrors (M1, M2), gratings (G1,G2), lengths (L1,L2), second-harmonic generator (SHG), photomultiplier tube (PMT), lock-in amplifier (LIA), data acquisition system (DAC), detector (DET), clock-extraction mechanism (CLK), frequency-to-voltage controller (FVC), high-voltage driver (HVD), reference signal (REF), pulse-generator (PGEN), amplitude modulator (AM), isolator (ISO), piezoelectric actuator (PZT), optical coupler (OC), polarizer (POL), and polarization controller (PC) all serve to provide control of pulse repetition rate and pulse width control.

The passive mode-locking mechanism can be based on nonlinear polarization rotation (NPR), which can be used in mode-locked fiber lasers. In this mechanism, weakly birefringent single mode fibers (SMF) can be used to create elliptically polarized light in a propagating pulse. As the pulse travels along the fiber, it experiences a nonlinear effect, where an intensity dependent polarization rotation occurs. By the time the pulse reaches the polarization controller (PC) 3001 the polarization state of the high intensity portion of the pulse experiences more rotation than the lower intensity one. The controller can perform the function of rotating the high intensity polarization component of the pulse, bringing its orientation as nearly aligned to the axis of the polarizer (POL) as possible. Consequently, as the pulse passes through the polarizer, its lower intensity components experience more attenuation than the high intensity components. The pulse coming out of the polarizer is, therefore, narrowed, and the entire process works as a Fast-Saturable Absorber (FSA). This nonlinear effect works in conjunction with the Group-Velocity Dispersion (GVD) of the loop, and, after a number of round trips, a situation of stability occurs, and passive mode-locking is achieved. The overall GVD of the optical loop can be tailored to produce, within a margin of error, an specific desired pulse width, by using different types of fibers (such as single mode, dispersion shifted, polarization maintaining, etc. . . . ), and adding up their contributions to the average GVD of the laser.

An active control of the linear polarization rotation from the PC can greatly improve the performance of the laser. This can be achieved using a feedback system that tracks down the evolution of the pulse width. This system, represented by the outer loop in FIG. 1 , can be used to maximize compression, and consequently, the average power of the pulse. A pulse coming out of the fiber ring laser through an OC is expected to have a width on the order of a few picoseconds. An external pulse compression scheme, which uses a fiber grating compressor, is used to narrow the pulse to a sub 100 fsec range. This technique has been extensively used in many reported experiments, leading to high energy, high power, USPL pulses. Here, the narrowed pulse is focused on a Second-Harmonic Generator (SHG) crystal and detected using a Photo-Multiplying Tube (PMT). The lock-in-amplifier (LIA) provides an output DC signal to a Data Acquisition Card (DAC). This signal follows variations of the pulse width by tracking increases, or decreases, in the pulses' peak power. A similar technique has been successfully used in the past, except that, in that case, a Spatial Light Modulator (SLM) was used instead. Here, a programmable servo-mechanism directly controls the linear polarization rotation using actuators on the PC. With the DC signal data provided by the DAC, a decision-making software (such as, but not limited to, LABVIEW or MATLAB SIMULINK) can be developed to control the servo-mechanism, which in turn adjusts the angle of rotation of the input pulse relative to the polarizer's axis. These adjustments, performed by the actuators, are achieved using stress induced birefringence. For instance, if the pulse width decreases, the mechanism will prompt the actuator to follow a certain direction of the linear angular rotation to compensate for that, and if the pulse width increases, it will act in the opposite direction, both aimed at maximizing the average output power.

A self-regenerative feedback system synchronized to the repetition rate of the optical oscillation, and used as a driving signal to an amplitude modulator (AM), can regulate the round trip time of the laser. In the active system, the amplitude modulator acts as a threshold gating device by modulating the loss, synchronously with the round trip time. This technique has can successfully stabilize mode-locked lasers in recent reports. A signal picked up from an optical coupler (OC) by a photo-detector (DET) can be electronically locked and regenerated by a clock extraction mechanism (CLK) such as a Phase-Locked Loop or a Synchronous Oscillator. The regenerated signal triggers a Pulse Generator (PGen), which is then used to drive the modulator. In a perfectly synchronized scenario, the AM will “open” every time the pulse passes through it, at each round trip time (TRT). Because the CLK follows variations on TRT, the driving signal of the AM will vary accordingly.

An outside reference signal (REF) can be used to tune the repetition rate of the cavity. It can be compared to the recovered signal from the CLK using a mixer, and the output used to drive a Piezoelectric (PZT) system, which can regulate the length of the cavity. Such use of a PZT system to regulate the cavity's length is a well-known concept, and similar designs have already been successfully demonstrated experimentally. Here a linear Frequency-to-Voltage Converter (FVC) may be calibrated to provide an input signal to the PZT's High Voltage Driver (HVD). The PZT will adjust the length of the cavity to match the repetition rate of the REF signal. If, for instance the REF signal increases its frequency, the output of the FVC will decrease, and so will the HV drive level to the piezoelectric-cylinder, forcing it to contract and, consequently increasing the repetition rate of the laser. The opposite occurs when the rep. rate of the reference decreases.

It is possible to have the width of the pulse tuned to a “transformed-limited” value using a pair of negative dispersion gratings. This chirped pulse compression technique is well established, and there has been reports of pulse compressions as narrow as 6 fs. The idea is to have the grating pair pulse compressor mounted on a moving stage that translates along a line which sets the separation between the gratings. As the distance changes, so does the compression factor.

In an example of a data modulation scheme consistent with implementations of the current subject matter, a passively mode locked laser can be used as the source of ultrafast pulses, which limits our flexibility to change the data modulation rate. In order to scale up the data rate of our system, we need to increase the base repetition rate of our pulse source. Traditionally, the repetition rate of a passively mode locked laser has been increased by either shortening the laser cavity length or by harmonic mode-locking of the laser. Both techniques cause the intra-cavity pulse peak power to decrease, resulting in longer pulse-widths and more unstable mode-locking.

One approach to solving this problem involves use of a modified pulse interleaving scheme, by a technique which we call pulse multiplication. FIG. 31 illustrates this concept. The lower repetition rate pulse train of a well-characterized, well-mode locked laser 3101 is coupled into an integrated-optical directional coupler 3180, where a well-determined fraction of the pulse is tapped off and “re-circulated” in an optical loop with an optical delay 3150 equal to the desired inter-pulse spacing in the output pulse train, and re-coupled to the output of the directional coupler. For instance, to generate a 1 GHz pulse train from a 10 MHz pulse train, an optical delay of Ins is required, and to enable the 100.sup.th pulse in the train to coincide with the input pulse from the 10 MHz source, the optical delay might have to be precisely controlled. The optical delay loop includes optical gain 3120 to compensate for signal attenuation, dispersion compensation 3160 to restore pulse-width and active optical delay control 3150. Once the pulse multiplication has occurred, the output pulse train is OOK-modulated 3175 with a data stream 3182 to generated RZ signal 3190, and amplified in an erbium-doped fiber amplifier 3185 to bring the pulse energy up to the same level as that of the input pulse train (or up to the desired output pulse energy level).

One or more of the features described herein, whether taken alone or in combination, can be included in various aspects or implementations of the current subject matter. For example, in some aspects, an optical wireless communication system can include at least one USPL laser source, which can optionally include one or more of pico-second, nano-second, femto-second and atto-second type laser sources. An optical wireless communication system can include USPL sources that can be fiber-coupled or free-space coupled to an optical transport system, can be modulated using one or more modulation techniques for point-to-multi-point communications system architectures, and/or can utilize optical transport terminals or telescopes manufactured through one or more of hyperbolic mirror fabrication techniques, conventional Newtonian mirror fabrication techniques, or other techniques that are functionally equivalent or similar. Aspheric optical designs can also or alternatively be used to minimize, reduce, etc. obscuration of a received optical signal.

Free-space optical transport systems consistent with implementations of the current subject matter can utilize USPL laser designs that focus a received signal at one ideal point. In some implementations one telescope or other optical element for focusing and delivering light can be considered as a transmitting element and a second telescope or other optical element for focusing and receiving light positioned remotely from the first telescope or other optical element can function as a receiving element to create an optical data-link. Both optical communication platforms can optionally include components necessary to provide both transmit and receive functions, and can be referred to as USPL optical transceivers. Either or both of the telescopes or other optical elements for focusing and delivering light can be coupled to a transmitting USPL source through either via optical fiber or by a free-space coupling to the transmitting element. Either or both of the telescopes or other optical elements for focusing and receiving light can be coupled to a receive endpoint through either optical fiber or a free-space coupling to the optical receiver. A free-space optical (FSO) wireless communication system including one or more USPL sources can be used: within the framework of an optical communications network, in conjunction with the fiber-optic backhaul network (and can be used transparently within optical communications networks within an optical communications network (and can be modulated using On-Off keying (OOK) Non-Return-to-Zero (NRZ), and Return-to-Zero (RZ) modulation techniques, within the 1550 nm optical communications band), within an optical communications network (and can be modulated using Differential-Phase-Shift Keying (DPSK) modulation techniques), within an optical communications network (and can be modulated using commonly used modulation techniques for point-to-point communications system architectures using commonly used free-space optical transceiver terminals), within an optical communications network utilizing D-TEK detection techniques, within a communications network for use in conjunction with Erbium-Doped Fiber Amplifiers (EDFA) as well as high power Erbium-Ytterbium Doped Fiber Amplifiers (Er/Yb-DFA), within an optical communications network (and can be modulated using commonly used modulation techniques for point-to-multi-point communications system architectures), etc.

USPL technology can, in some aspects, be utilized as a beacon source to providing optical tracking and beam steering for use in auto-tracking capabilities and for maintaining terminal co-alignment during operation. The recovered clock and data extracted at the receive terminal can be used for multi-hop spans for use in extending network reach. The optical network can be provided with similar benefits in WDM configurations, thereby increasing the magnitude of effective optical bandwidth of the carrier data link. USP laser sources can also or alternatively be polarization multiplexed onto the transmitted optical signal to provide polarization multiplex USP-FSO (PM-USP-FSO) functionality. The recovered clock and data extracted at the receive terminal can be used for multi-hop spans for use in extending network reach, and can include a generic, large bandwidth range of operation for providing data-rate invariant operation. An optical pre-amplifier or semi-conductor optical amplifier (SOA) can be used prior to the optical receiver element and, alternatively or in combination with the recovered clock and data extracted at the receive terminal, can be used for multi-hop spans for use in extending network reach, having a generic, large bandwidth range of operation for providing data-rate invariant operation. Terminal co-alignment can be maintained during operation, such that significant improvement in performance and terminal co-alignment can be realized through the use of USPL technology, through the use of USPL data source as well as providing a improved approach to maintaining transceiver alignment through the use of USPL laser beacons.

USPL-FSO transceivers can be utilized in some aspects for performing remote-sensing and detection for signatures of airborne elements using ionization or non-ionization detection techniques, utilizing optical transport terminals manufactured through either the Hyperbolic Mirror Fabrication Techniques or conventional Newtonian designs that focus a received signal at one ideal point. USPL-FSO transceivers consistent with implementations of the current subject matter can be utilized in non-line of sight lasercom applications. USPL-FSO transceivers consistent with implementations of the current subject matter can allow adjustment of the distance at which the scattering effect (enabling NLOS technique) takes place, reception techniques to improve detection sensitivity using DTech detection schemes, and improved bandwidth via broadband detectors including frequency combs. USPL-FSO transceivers consistent with implementations of the current subject matter can be utilized in conjunction with Adaptive Optic (AO) Techniques for performing incoming optical wave-front correction (AO-USPL-FSO). USPL-FSO transceivers consistent with implementations of the current subject matter can be utilized and operate across the infrared wavelength range. USPL-FSO transceivers consistent with implementations of the current subject matter can be utilized in conjunction with optical add-drop and optical multiplexing techniques, in both single-mode as well as multi-mode fiber configurations. A USPL-FSO transceiver consistent with implementations of the current subject matter can be utilized and operated across the infrared wavelength range as a range-finder and spotting apparatus for the purposes of target identification and interrogation applications.

In other aspects of the current subject matter, a series of switched network connections, such as for example 10 GigE, 100 GigE, or the like connections can be connected from one point to another, either over fiber or free-space optics, for example via Time Division Multiplexing (TDM).

A mode-locked USPL source consistent with implementations of the current subject matter can be used to generate both clock and data streams. Mode-locked lasers can represent a choice of a high performance, high finesse source for clocks in digital communication systems. In this respect, mode-locked fiber lasers—in either linear or ring configuration—can make an attractive candidate of choice, as they can achieve pulse widths of the USPL sources region and repetition rate as high as GHz.

High harmonic generation can be achieved using carbon nano-tubes saturable absorbers. Passive mode-locked fiber lasers using carbon nano-tubes saturable absorbers (CNT-SA) make an option for high rep rate sources due to their ability to readily generate high harmonics of the fundamental rep rate.

FSO can be used in terrestrial, space and undersea applications.

Conditional path lengths control from splitter to aperture can be an important parameter. TDM multiplexes can be employed consistent with implementations of the current subject matter to control the relative temporal time delay between aperture-to-source paths. Each pulse train can be controlled using parallel time delay channels. This technique can be used to control conventional multiple-transmit FSO aperture systems employing WDM as well as TDM systems. USPL laser pulse-to-pulse spacing can be maintained and controlled to precise temporal requirements for both TDM and WDM systems. The techniques described can be used in TDM and WDM fiber based system. The use of TDM multiplexers as described herein can be used implement unique encryption means onto the transmitted optical signal. A complementary TDM multiplexer can be utilized to invert the incoming received signal, and thereby recover the unique signature of the pulse signals. A TDM multiplexer described herein can be utilized to control WDM pulse character for the purpose of WDM encryption. A TDM multiplexer can be used in conventional FSO systems wherein multiple apertures connected to a common source signal are capable of having the temporal delay between pulses controlled to maintain constant path lengths. A TDM multiplexer can be used for TDM fiber based and FSO based systems. A TDM multiplexer can be an enabling technology to control optical pulse train relationship for USPL sources. A TDM multiplexer can be used as an atmospheric link characterization utility across an optical link through measurement of neural correction factor to get same pulse relational ship.

Any combination of PZ discs can be used in a transmitter and can have an infinite number of encryption combinations for USPL based systems, both fiber and FSO based. The timing can run from 10 GigE switches or the equivalent and to build up the USPL to a Terabit/second (or faster) rate with a Multiplier Photonic chip, and this Terabit/second signal can be modulated directly from the 10 GigE switch. While operating in a WDM configuration, an interface either to a fiber based system or to a FSO network element can be included.

A system can accept an ultrafast optical pulse train and can generate a train of optical pulses with pulse-width, spectral content, chirp characteristics identical to that of the input optical pulse, and with a pulse repetition rate being an integral multiple of that of the input pulse. This can be accomplished by tapping a fraction of the input pulse power in a 2×2 optical coupler with an actively controllable optical coupling coefficient, re-circulating this tapped pulse over one round trip in an optical delay line provided with optical amplification, optical isolation, optical delay (path length) control, optical phase and amplitude modulation, and compensation of temporal and spectral evolution experienced by the optical pulse in the optical delay line for the purpose of minimizing temporal pulse width at the output of the device, and recombining this power with the 2×2 optical coupler.

Passive or active optical delay control can be used, as can optical gain utilizing rare-earth-doped optical fiber and/or rare-earth-doped integrated optical device and/or electrically- or optically-pumped semiconductor optical amplification. Dispersion compensation can be provided using fiber-Bragg gratings and/or volume Bragg gratings. Wavelength division multiplexing data modulation of the pulse traversing the delay line can be sued as can pulse code data modulation of the pulse traversing the delay line.

The tailoring of conventional USPL sources through synthesis of USPL square wave pulses can be accomplished utilizing micro-lithographic amplitude and phase mask technologies, for FSO applications. The ability to adjust pulse widths using technology and similar approaches to control and actively control pulse with this technology can improve propagation efficiency through FSO transmission links, thereby improving system availability and received optical power levels.

Active programmable pulse shapers can be used to actively control USPL pulse-width can include matching real-time atmospheric conditions to maximize propagation through changing environments. One or more of the following techniques can be used in FSO applications to adapt the optical temporal spectrum using techniques: Fourier Transform Pulse shaping, Liquid Crystal Modular (LCM) Arrays, Liquid Crystal on Silicon (LCOS) Technology, Programmable Pulse Shaping using Acousto-optic modulators (AOM), Acousto-optic Programmable Dispersive Filter (AOPDF), and Polarization Pulse Shaping.

FIG. 32 shows a process flow chart 3200 illustrating features of a method, one or more of which can appear in implementations of the current subject matter. At 3202, a beam of light pulses each having a duration of approximately 1 nanosecond or shorter is generated. At 3204, a modulation signal is applied to the beam to generate a modulated optical signal. The modulation signal carrying data for transmission to a remote receiving apparatus. The modulated optical signal is received at an optical transceiver within an optical communication platform at 3206, and at 3210 the modulated optical signal is transmitted using the optical transceiver for receipt by the second optical communication apparatus

FIG. 33 shows another process flow chart 3300 illustrating features of a method, one or more of which can appear in implementations of the current subject matter. At 3302, a beam of light pulses each having a duration of approximately 1 nanosecond or shorter is generated, for example using a USPL source. The beam of light pulses is transmitted at 3304 toward a target atmospheric region via an optical transceiver. At 3306, optical information received at the optical transceiver as a result of optical backscattering of the beam of light pulses from one or more objects in the target atmospheric region is analyzed.

FIG. 34 shows another process flow chart 3400 illustrating features of a method, one or more of which can appear in implementations of the current subject matter. At 3402, first and second beams comprising light pulses are generated, for example by a USPL source. At 3404, a first modulation signal is applied to the first beam to generate a first modulated optical signal and a second modulation signal is applied to the second beam to generate a second modulated optical signal. A first polarization state of the first modulated optical signal is adjusted at 3406. Optionally, a second polarization states of the second modulated optical signal can also be adjusted. At 3410, the first modulated optical signal having the adjusted first polarization state is multiplexed with the second modulated signal. At 3412, the multiplexed first modulated optical signal having the adjusted first polarization state with the second modulated signal is transmitted by an optical transceiver for receipt by a second optical communication apparatus.

One or more aspects or features of the subject matter described herein can be realized in digital electronic circuitry, integrated circuitry, specially designed application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) computer hardware, firmware, software, and/or combinations thereof. These various aspects or features can include implementation in one or more computer programs that are executable and/or interpretable on a programmable system including at least one programmable processor, which can be special or general purpose, coupled to receive data and instructions from, and to transmit data and instructions to, a storage system, at least one input device, and at least one output device.

These computer programs, which can also be referred to as programs, software, software applications, applications, components, or code, include machine instructions for a programmable processor, and can be implemented in a high-level procedural and/or object-oriented programming language, and/or in assembly/machine language. As used herein, the term “machine-readable medium” refers to any computer program product, apparatus and/or device, such as for example magnetic discs, optical disks, memory, and Programmable Logic Devices (PLDs), used to provide machine instructions and/or data to a programmable processor, including a machine-readable medium that receives machine instructions as a machine-readable signal. The term “machine-readable signal” refers to any signal used to provide machine instructions and/or data to a programmable processor. The machine-readable medium can store such machine instructions non-transitorily, such as for example as would a non-transient solid-state memory or a magnetic hard drive or any equivalent storage medium. The machine-readable medium can alternatively or additionally store such machine instructions in a transient manner, such as for example as would a processor cache or other random access memory associated with one or more physical processor cores.

To provide for interaction with a user, one or more aspects or features of the subject matter described herein can be implemented on a computer having a display device, such as for example a cathode ray tube (CRT) or a liquid crystal display (LCD) or a light emitting diode (LED) monitor for displaying information to the user and a keyboard and a pointing device, such as for example a mouse or a trackball, by which the user may provide input to the computer. Other kinds of devices can be used to provide for interaction with a user as well. For example, feedback provided to the user can be any form of sensory feedback, such as for example visual feedback, auditory feedback, or tactile feedback; and input from the user may be received in any form, including, but not limited to, acoustic, speech, or tactile input. Other possible input devices include, but are not limited to, touch screens or other touch-sensitive devices such as single or multi-point resistive or capacitive trackpads, voice recognition hardware and software, optical scanners, optical pointers, digital image capture devices and associated interpretation software, and the like. A computer remote from an analyzer can be linked to the analyzer over a wired or wireless network to enable data exchange between the analyzer and the remote computer (e.g. receiving data at the remote computer from the analyzer and transmitting information such as calibration data, operating parameters, software upgrades or updates, and the like) as well as remote control, diagnostics, etc. of the analyzer.

The subject matter described herein can be embodied in systems, apparatus, methods, and/or articles depending on the desired configuration. The implementations set forth in the foregoing description do not represent all implementations consistent with the subject matter described herein. Instead, they are merely some examples consistent with aspects related to the described subject matter. Although a few variations have been described in detail above, other modifications or additions are possible. In particular, further features and/or variations can be provided in addition to those set forth herein. For example, the implementations described above can be directed to various combinations and sub-combinations of the disclosed features and/or combinations and sub-combinations of several further features disclosed above. In addition, the logic flows depicted in the accompanying figures and/or described herein do not necessarily require the particular order shown, or sequential order, to achieve desirable results. Other implementations may be within the scope of the following claims. 

What is claimed is:
 1. An optical communication or sensor system for generating a free-space optical (FSO) beam for enhanced propagation through a lossy medium, the system comprising: an ultra-short-pulse-laser (USPL) source and a modulator operably arranged either internal to or external to the USPL source and configured to perform data modulation to generate a data-modulated optical output comprising data-modulated optical pulses each having a pulse duration of 1 nanosecond or shorter, a peak optical pulse power of 1 kilowatt (kWatt) or greater, and a data capacity of at least 1 gigabit per second (Gbps); and a first optical transceiver configured to receive and convert the data-modulated optical output into a FSO beam that is transmitted through the lossy medium to a photo-detector; and wherein the lossy medium comprises at least one of water aerosols, turbulent air and clear air scintillation that present an optically impaired atmospheric condition to the FSO beam.
 2. The optical communication or sensor system of claim 1, wherein the data-modulated optical output has a pulse spectral bandwidth with an infrared center wavelength.
 3. The optical communication or sensor system of claim 1, wherein the pulse duration is less than a picosecond.
 4. The optical communication or sensor system of claim 1, wherein the pulse duration is less than 100 femtoseconds.
 5. The optical communication or sensor system of claim 1, wherein the pulse duration is less than a femtosecond.
 6. The optical communication or sensor system of claim 1, wherein the peak optical pulse power is equal to or greater than 5 kWatts.
 7. The optical communication or sensor system of claim 1, wherein the peak optical pulse power is equal to or greater than 10 kWatts.
 8. The optical communication or sensor system of claim 1, wherein the pulse duration is equal to or less than 100 femtoseconds and the peak optical pulse power is greater than 10 kWatts.
 9. The optical communication or sensor system of claim 1, further comprising an optical multiplexer that multiplexes more than one data channel into the FSO beam.
 10. The optical communication or sensor system of claim 1, wherein the data modulation comprises impulsive-coding modulation.
 11. The optical communication or sensor system of claim 1, wherein the lossy medium comprises water aerosols and wherein the system provides an improved signal peak-to-fade of 25 dB or greater as compared to free space optical beam generated using a continuous wave laser having a same average power as the USPL source.
 12. The optical communication or sensor system of claim 1, wherein the USPL source further has a repetition rate of at least 1 GHz.
 13. A method of forming a free-space optical beam for enhanced propagation through a lossy medium, comprising: generating, at an optical transmitter, a data-modulated pulsed optical output comprising optical pulses, wherein each optical pulse has a pulse duration of 1 nanosecond or shorter, a peak optical pulse power of 1 kilowatt or greater, and a data capacity of at least 1 gigabit per second (Gbps); forming a free-space optical beam from the data-modulated pulsed optical output; transmitting the free-space optical beam through the lossy medium to a photo-detector; and detecting the free-space optical beam at the photo-detector; wherein the lossy medium comprises at least one of water aerosols, turbulent air and clear air scintillation that present an optically impaired atmospheric condition to the free-space optical beam.
 14. The method of claim 13, wherein the optical transmitter provides an improved signal peak-to-fade measurement of at least 10 dB as compared to free space optical beam generated using a continuous wave laser having a same average power as the optical transmitter.
 15. The method of claim 13, wherein the generating of the data-modulated pulsed optical output comprises performing impulsive coding.
 16. The method of claim 13, wherein the peak optical pulse power is either: a) between 5 kiloWatts and 10 kiloWatts; or b) greater than 10 kiloWatts with a pulse duration of less than 100 femtoseconds.
 17. The method of claim 13, wherein the data-modulated pulsed optical output further has a repetition rate of at least 1 GHz. 